Steve T Power wrote:The Holy Mountain - After digging El Topo I thought i'd give Jodorowsky's "great work" a try. No, just no.
Steve T Power wrote:Hey Bryan,
I loved Parnassus myself, but it wasn't just you with Burn After Reading. I managed to finish it, but only just. I'd place it squarely at the bottom of the Coen list, and i'd put A Serious Man right next to it (though i know people like that one).
molly1216 wrote:Steve T Power wrote:Hey Bryan,
I loved Parnassus myself, but it wasn't just you with Burn After Reading. I managed to finish it, but only just. I'd place it squarely at the bottom of the Coen list, and i'd put A Serious Man right next to it (though i know people like that one).
Ditto.
I didn't finish Burn After Reading, Confessions of a Dangerous Mind and lastly...Men Who Stare At Goats...does that make me a bad person? or just a lazy one?
Bryan Byun wrote:I'm glad I'm not alone on Burn After Reading. I made it through A Serious Man, but I found it too mean-spirited and dreary to be especially meaningful. I guess that's my problem with the Coens -- they've got such a strong misanthropic, cynical streak, and as much as I love their films as a whole (Raising Arizona's one of my all-time faves), sometimes their apparent contempt for their characters is overbearing and no fun.
Boy, has there been a really good Coen Bros. comedy since O Brother, ten years ago? Intolerable Cruelty, The Ladykillers...hmmm. Maybe it was the Bush presidency that killed their sense of joy.Steve T Power wrote:I can second that. I also found they've gotten a little less jovial since No Country for Old Men (which I did enjoy), bitingly cynical, but less fun. I'd heard they lost their father or something, and that was affecting the mood of their work, *shrug*. I know one thing, the film that was advertised in the trailers for Burn After Reading was NOT the film I watched.
Still, they'll always have Miller's Crossing and O Brother, Where Art Thou?.
Bryan Byun wrote:Boy, has there been a really good Coen Bros. comedy since O Brother, ten years ago? Intolerable Cruelty, The Ladykillers...hmmm. Maybe it was the Bush presidency that killed their sense of joy.Steve T Power wrote:I can second that. I also found they've gotten a little less jovial since No Country for Old Men (which I did enjoy), bitingly cynical, but less fun. I'd heard they lost their father or something, and that was affecting the mood of their work, *shrug*. I know one thing, the film that was advertised in the trailers for Burn After Reading was NOT the film I watched.
Still, they'll always have Miller's Crossing and O Brother, Where Art Thou?.
Well, I've got high hopes for True Grit. Jeff Bridges, Matt Damon, Barry Pepper...
tucco wrote:* Blasphemy Alert *
I never finished Yojimbo..While I love Kurosawa as much as the next person (roughly of course), I just didn't like this one...it just didn't grab me.....I like films of his from this general era but not this one.
Andrew Forbes wrote:tucco wrote:* Blasphemy Alert *
I never finished Yojimbo..While I love Kurosawa as much as the next person (roughly of course), I just didn't like this one...it just didn't grab me.....I like films of his from this general era but not this one.
That surprises me. I've always thought of Yojimbo as the most outright entertaining and accessible of Kurosawa's movies. Not to say you will change your mind, but I'd recommend giving it another shot.
Having said that, I'm the guy who thinks Seven Samurai could stand to lose 40 minutes, so I'm at least as blasphemous..
Steve T Power wrote:Andrew Forbes wrote:Having said that, I'm the guy who thinks Seven Samurai could stand to lose 40 minutes, so I'm at least as blasphemous.
Yeah, I got nothing for that statement. Seven Samurai is one of my all time faves. I just can't see where the minutes could be cut from. Maybe if you trimmed 5 here or 5 there, but outside the overall length making it unsuitable for daily, "I've got an hour or two to burn" viewing, i just can't think of anything that would help the movie by being cut.
Steve T Power wrote:The big one, Bergman's The Seventh Seal - What others consider an important film, I found to be a pretentious, meandering bore. I`ve tried three times, I`m done now.
azul017 wrote:Steve T Power wrote:The big one, Bergman's The Seventh Seal - What others consider an important film, I found to be a pretentious, meandering bore. I`ve tried three times, I`m done now.
Thank goodness. Glad I'm not the only one.
Andrew Forbes wrote:azul017 wrote:Steve T Power wrote:The big one, Bergman's The Seventh Seal - What others consider an important film, I found to be a pretentious, meandering bore. I`ve tried three times, I`m done now.
Thank goodness. Glad I'm not the only one.
To each his own, but even if you consider the movie ponderous, boring, shallow, etc, etc, calling Bergman pretentious seems pretty whack. Unless "pretentious" is newspeak for "interested in serious themes." I don't think dude gives a crap about projecting an aura of importance or sophistication. He just makes movies about what he is interested in and genuinely tries to express ideas seriously. Woody Allen in Bergman mode, on the other hand...
Steve T Power wrote:True enough. More accurately, people who gush and preen about the importance or sophistication of The Seventh Seal and how much everyone who "loves cinema" should see it are the pretentious ones... the movie is just a preachy meandering bore...
Gabriel Girard wrote:The Adventures Of Buckaroo Banzai Across The 8th Dimension.
HGervais wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:The Adventures Of Buckaroo Banzai Across The 8th Dimension.
I just swallowed my gum in shock.
Gabriel Girard wrote:HGervais wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:The Adventures Of Buckaroo Banzai Across The 8th Dimension.
I just swallowed my gum in shock.
Believe it or not, I couldn't swallow more than 30 mins of that ''cult classic'', it made zero sense and it was just plain bad IMHO. At least the proposed sequel gave us the real classic that is Big Trouble In Little China.
Dunnyman wrote:I've found that 20 tablets of Dalmane don't work nearly as effectively as 2001 for putting me into a coma-like stupor. There's no possible way my attention can be held for long enough to finish it. On my last attempt I set my timer to find out exactly when I bailed and while it was only 33 minutes, it seemed like 33 hours. Andy Warhol's Sleep was more interesting. You may now throw farm fresh produce, garbage, and kitchen sinks at me.
Dan Mancini wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:HGervais wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:The Adventures Of Buckaroo Banzai Across The 8th Dimension.
I just swallowed my gum in shock.
Believe it or not, I couldn't swallow more than 30 mins of that ''cult classic'', it made zero sense and it was just plain bad IMHO. At least the proposed sequel gave us the real classic that is Big Trouble In Little China.
So, let me get this straight. You didn't even admire the subtle and nuanced performance by John Lithgow?
tucco wrote:Raising Cain .......just didn't dig it....really can't think of any others that I haven't finished on purpose.
Future Man wrote:The original Solaris comes to mind. I keep meaning to get back to it. I don't mind slow movies per se.
Attrage wrote:Moulin Rouge. That film for me was and is the cinematic equivalent of a migraine headache.
Yeah, Buckaroo Banzai went to the nearly new DVD store along with The Aviator, Moulin Rouge, and not all that many more. The smarm of "Let's make a cult classic." was enough for me.Gabriel Girard wrote:Lithgow doesn't even know the meaning of those words.Dan Mancini wrote:So, let me get this straight. You didn't even admire the subtle and nuanced performance by John Lithgow?Gabriel Girard wrote:Believe it or not, I couldn't swallow more than 30 mins of that ''cult classic'', it made zero sense and it was just plain bad IMHO. At least the proposed sequel gave us the real classic that is Big Trouble In Little China.HGervais wrote:I just swallowed my gum in shock.Gabriel Girard wrote:The Adventures Of Buckaroo Banzai Across The 8th Dimension.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest