mavrach wrote:That's exactly it, just forcing yourself to watch a movie often works out well. I found out the same having recently mining my formerly unwatched DVD pile of 100+ movies. I'd been waiting for some sort of perfect mood for many of them, so when I decided to just dive in, I found some gems that I couldn't beleive I'd been sitting on for so long.
Gabriel Girard wrote:mavrach wrote:That's exactly it, just forcing yourself to watch a movie often works out well. I found out the same having recently mining my formerly unwatched DVD pile of 100+ movies. I'd been waiting for some sort of perfect mood for many of them, so when I decided to just dive in, I found some gems that I couldn't beleive I'd been sitting on for so long.
That's happened to me to, I picked Wild Strawberries at random one night when I couldn't sleep and I loved it even if I was not in the optimum mood. You have to watch Hard Times! So excellent!
Steve T Power wrote:When I first cooked up the idea, the biggest reason I wanted to focus on individual directors was precisely so we could dig into one filmmaker's backlog and maybe either discover a newfound appreciation for them (like we did with our most recent episode, which you guys will hear in a few weeks... i think anyway) or otherwise deconstruct someone who may have gotten a little more credit than they deserve.
The other idea was that we would have such contrasting ideas on our "good, bad, and ugly" choices that we could each turn over a different cinematic stone or two for people listening.
I think it's going to work out pretty well - And I hope you guys really enjoy our little ride.
Thanks a bunch for listening, and each and every piece of feedback is appreciated.
Gabriel Girard wrote:Steve T Power wrote:When I first cooked up the idea, the biggest reason I wanted to focus on individual directors was precisely so we could dig into one filmmaker's backlog and maybe either discover a newfound appreciation for them (like we did with our most recent episode, which you guys will hear in a few weeks... i think anyway) or otherwise deconstruct someone who may have gotten a little more credit than they deserve.
The other idea was that we would have such contrasting ideas on our "good, bad, and ugly" choices that we could each turn over a different cinematic stone or two for people listening.
I think it's going to work out pretty well - And I hope you guys really enjoy our little ride.
Thanks a bunch for listening, and each and every piece of feedback is appreciated.
Just remember it wa my idea that we should do a podcast in the first place.While our opinions may differ, I think we're pretty much on the same page. Maybe that'll change with the director I picked for the second to next recording.

stypee wrote:Many have asked when you are going to have stypee on as a guest from the states. People find him hilarious and he is also a very nice person and a great pal to many people.
mavrach wrote:America could do a fake yawn (as with a date in the theater) and bump the border up a few miles and we'll all be in the same boat.
Gabriel Girard wrote:mavrach wrote:America could do a fake yawn (as with a date in the theater) and bump the border up a few miles and we'll all be in the same boat.
LOL. You would have to have been born in Canada then, which would also keep us running if Québec ever separates.
Mitchell Hattaway wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:mavrach wrote:America could do a fake yawn (as with a date in the theater) and bump the border up a few miles and we'll all be in the same boat.
LOL. You would have to have been born in Canada then, which would also keep us running if Québec ever separates.
What happens if you go back to Germany? That ain't north. Is Matt going to take over then?

Gabriel Girard wrote:Mitchell Hattaway wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:mavrach wrote:America could do a fake yawn (as with a date in the theater) and bump the border up a few miles and we'll all be in the same boat.
LOL. You would have to have been born in Canada then, which would also keep us running if Québec ever separates.
What happens if you go back to Germany? That ain't north. Is Matt going to take over then?
Ich würde dann das Podcast auf Deutsch machen! We'll cross that bridge if/when we get there. The scheduling would really be a headache because it's 6 hours later from here in Berlin. We're supposed to have another canadian as a guest on the show soon. Maybe he could take over if he does well (I'm sure he will, he's a former Verdict judge)
Mitchell Hattaway wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:Mitchell Hattaway wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:mavrach wrote:America could do a fake yawn (as with a date in the theater) and bump the border up a few miles and we'll all be in the same boat.
LOL. You would have to have been born in Canada then, which would also keep us running if Québec ever separates.
What happens if you go back to Germany? That ain't north. Is Matt going to take over then?
Ich würde dann das Podcast auf Deutsch machen! We'll cross that bridge if/when we get there. The scheduling would really be a headache because it's 6 hours later from here in Berlin. We're supposed to have another canadian as a guest on the show soon. Maybe he could take over if he does well (I'm sure he will, he's a former Verdict judge)
Five Canadians? Somebody needs to put a stop to this.
Gabriel Girard wrote:Steve is willing to sit it out because Adam apparently REALLY wants to do Cronenberg. Having five of us would probably make the show two hours long...
Mitchell Hattaway wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:Steve is willing to sit it out because Adam apparently REALLY wants to do Cronenberg. Having five of us would probably make the show two hours long...
Good. I don't really care for Steve.
Gabriel Girard wrote:Steve is willing to sit it out because Adam apparently REALLY wants to do Cronenberg. Having five of us would probably make the show two hours long...
mavrach wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:Steve is willing to sit it out because Adam apparently REALLY wants to do Cronenberg. Having five of us would probably make the show two hours long...
Mitchell Hattaway wrote:A couple weeks back Steve and I were joking about how long the Ridley episode would be. Now I'm really worried.
Andrew Forbes wrote:Mitchell Hattaway wrote:A couple weeks back Steve and I were joking about how long the Ridley episode would be. Now I'm really worried.
I've decided to start a coke habit in preparation.
Steve T Power wrote:Andrew Forbes wrote:Mitchell Hattaway wrote:A couple weeks back Steve and I were joking about how long the Ridley episode would be. Now I'm really worried.
I've decided to start a coke habit in preparation.
Worth a mention: The Ridley episode will be a two parter...
Mitchell Hattaway wrote:Steve T Power wrote:Andrew Forbes wrote:Mitchell Hattaway wrote:A couple weeks back Steve and I were joking about how long the Ridley episode would be. Now I'm really worried.
I've decided to start a coke habit in preparation.
Worth a mention: The Ridley episode will be a two parter...
So 500 minutes each?
Steve T Power wrote:Mitchell Hattaway wrote:Steve T Power wrote:Andrew Forbes wrote:Mitchell Hattaway wrote:A couple weeks back Steve and I were joking about how long the Ridley episode would be. Now I'm really worried.
I've decided to start a coke habit in preparation.
Worth a mention: The Ridley episode will be a two parter...
So 500 minutes each?
I'll try to keep it under the runtime of Lawrence of Arabia
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests