"Titular" =/= "eponymous

We welcome your questions, comments, and suggestions on any of the Verdict sites

"Titular" =/= "eponymous

Postby Calidore » Tue Mar 01, 2011 10:35 pm

Been enjoying the site for many years, but I'm seeing this more and more, and not just here. "Titular" may be more fun to type and say, but it means a title held without real authority, while "eponymous" refers to someone/thing named in a title: Batman is the eponymous hero of his eponymous show, not the titular anything.

I suggest to the judges, especially the guilty (*cough*) ones, that you start using the phrase "eponymous (not titular)" in your reviews. This spreads the correct usage, gives the impression--accurate or not--that you always knew the difference, and you still get to type "titular."

Best,

Calidore
Calidore
Law Clerk
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:33 am

Re: "Titular" =/= "eponymous

Postby Dan Mancini » Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:38 am

While the grammar cop in me yearns to agree, English is a language that evolves based on popular not proper usage, and the definition of "titular" appears to be evolving. It's common now in American dictionaries to find an adjectival definition of "titular" something along the lines of "Of, relating to, constituting, or derived from a title (as in the titular hero of a play)." I took a quick look and found such definitions in both Webster's and The American Heritage, as well as at Dictionary.com and a couple other online dictionaries. In some of those sources, that definition actually preceded "in name only."

"Eponymous" is definitely more clear and concise, but I suspect it's dying in American usage (I'm not sure about British usage).

But, hey, I'd gladly allow "eponymous" to be absorbed into "titular" in exchange for rolling back the madness of using "they" as a gender-neutral singular pronoun. Compromise!
User avatar
Dan Mancini
Chief Prosecutor
 
Posts: 4052
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 7:17 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: "Titular" =/= "eponymous

Postby Calidore » Wed Mar 02, 2011 10:22 am

I double-checked my Merriam-Webster Collegiate (the editing/proofreading standard) and also found that definition this time--I'd overlooked it because it's buried at #3 and is much less wordy than the others. So, fine. I prefer my titulars flexible rather than rigid anyway.

Best,

Calidore
Calidore
Law Clerk
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 6:33 am

Re: "Titular" =/= "eponymous

Postby mavrach » Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:18 pm

Plus "titular" is one of those words that makes you chuckle immaturely, kind of like "condiment."
+1. this is very interesting.
User avatar
mavrach
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 11:41 am
Location: North Jersey, at the end of a one-way dead-end road.

Re: "Titular" =/= "eponymous

Postby Andrew Forbes » Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:00 am

mavrach wrote:Plus "titular" is one of those words that makes you chuckle immaturely, kind of like "condiment."

Dictaphone.

Dictaphone.
Formerly chamucamel
User avatar
Andrew Forbes
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 2615
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: "Titular" =/= "eponymous

Postby Attrage » Wed Mar 16, 2011 3:42 am

I gotta say I'm with Homer Simpson on this one: "I can't say the word 'titmouse' without giggling like a school girl! he he heee"
Don't worry darling, its just a hat, belonging to a small man of limited means who lost a fight with a chicken!
User avatar
Attrage
City Attorney
 
Posts: 372
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:47 pm


Return to Verdict Feedback

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron