Ebert's candid take on his old TV show...

Current or vintage, broadcast, internet, cable, or satellite

Ebert's candid take on his old TV show...

Postby J.M. Vargas » Mon Nov 30, 2009 2:01 pm

... from his blog: http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2009/11/post.html. He pretty much takes a dump on Lyons and Mankiewicz (more on the former than the latter) and this quote is vintage Ebert:
The show's reviews were not kind. Two websites opened to catalogue Lyon's lapses. I e-mailed Mankiewicz in sympathy, comparing him to the victim of a drive-by shooting.
:lol:
'You can't make chicken salad out of chicken s***'
User avatar
J.M. Vargas
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 3122
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 6:23 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: Ebert's candid take on his old TV show...

Postby Mach6 » Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:00 pm

I agree with Ebert 100%. I don't know what the hell that corporate nitwit was thinking by replacing Roeper & whomever with "The Bens" was a good idea. Demographics! To me, Roeper & Michael Phillips should've been the permanent hosts. They had good chemistry, probably because both of them are working for rival Chicago newspapers. (Ironically, just like Siskel & Ebert.) Their reviews were entertaining & informative & they could really trash a God-awful film like Siskel & Ebert did. "The Bens" reviews of bad movies were just that: BAD! Just compare their boring & stiff review of Transformers 2 to Siskel & Ebert's review of Highlander 2 The Quickening or Phillips & Roeper's review of The Love Guru. Lyons is an easy target, but Mankiewicz deserves some blame too. Mankiewicz did show some intelligence, but he was bland & lacks Roeper's sense of humor.

I liked what I've seen from A.O. Scott & Michael Phillips as the new hosts. While Scott is no Roeper, he doesn't insult my intelligence or bore me to death. I can look forward to watching At The Movies again.
Mach6
City Attorney
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 5:12 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Ebert's candid take on his old TV show...

Postby Bill Treadway » Mon Nov 30, 2009 9:25 pm

Reminds me of a line in a Woody Allen film: "Demographics? You mean how the country suddenly became stupid?"

I really shouldn't be surprised at what Disney did. After all, they've screwed more people than in a porn film..
Bill Treadway
City Attorney
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 11:54 am
Location: Queens, New York

Re: Ebert's candid take on his old TV show...

Postby Stubblecat » Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:46 pm

That Sunday morning in early 1999 when I sat down to watch Siskel & Ebert, only to be greeted by Roger eulogizing Gene, was the day that the concept of credible television movie criticsm died.
"A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere." - Groucho Marx
User avatar
Stubblecat
City Attorney
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 2:21 pm
Location: Kitchener, Ontario

Re: Ebert's candid take on his old TV show...

Postby Steve T Power » Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:49 am

I'll always consider Ebert a reviewer - not a critic.

Siskel on the other hand...
As the ancient Tibetan philosophy states:"Don't start none... won't be none...".
User avatar
Steve T Power
Judge
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, CA


Return to Television

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron