BrettCullum wrote:Oh LORD! Didn't Hughes just kinda remake the same film over and over? He wrote over forty films, but really only directed eight of them...
The Good?
That is actually tough, but I am going to say SIXTEEN CANDLES. It was his first, and it defined everything that came after it.It was smart, romantic, funny, and anybody could relate. Most of what he did was a variation on this basic little film that just worked in every way.
BrettCullum wrote:Basically SIXTEEN CANDLES was the template for PRETTY IN PINK, WEIRD SCIENCE, SOME KIND OF WONDERFUL, and any of the teen movies he made. The only one that broke out of the mold was THE BREAKFAST CLUB which is more of its own thing than the rest. But CANDLES even has a strong influence on FERRIS BUELLER'S DAY OFF... it's his ultimate work in my book. And how can you not relate to at least one of those characters?
Gabriel Girard wrote:BrettCullum wrote:Basically SIXTEEN CANDLES was the template for PRETTY IN PINK, WEIRD SCIENCE, SOME KIND OF WONDERFUL, and any of the teen movies he made. The only one that broke out of the mold was THE BREAKFAST CLUB which is more of its own thing than the rest. But CANDLES even has a strong influence on FERRIS BUELLER'S DAY OFF... it's his ultimate work in my book. And how can you not relate to at least one of those characters?
Like I said on the podcast all the caracters in SIXTEEN CANDLES are awful stereotypes. I shoukld identify with Hall's geek but that character makes no sense to me - he really seems to believe that he'ss a lady-killer. No nerds I knew acted like that.
Bryan Pope wrote:Gabriel Girard wrote:BrettCullum wrote:Basically SIXTEEN CANDLES was the template for PRETTY IN PINK, WEIRD SCIENCE, SOME KIND OF WONDERFUL, and any of the teen movies he made. The only one that broke out of the mold was THE BREAKFAST CLUB which is more of its own thing than the rest. But CANDLES even has a strong influence on FERRIS BUELLER'S DAY OFF... it's his ultimate work in my book. And how can you not relate to at least one of those characters?
Like I said on the podcast all the caracters in SIXTEEN CANDLES are awful stereotypes. I shoukld identify with Hall's geek but that character makes no sense to me - he really seems to believe that he'ss a lady-killer. No nerds I knew acted like that.
The nerds I knew WOULD have thought they had a shot with a girl like Sam. She's cute, but not a knockout. Kinda cool, but really a wallflower. And not in the in-crowd. To me, it makes sense.
And as I already mentioned to you on FB, I think Hughes should at least get credit for fleshing out Sam's parents in a way that few teen films did back then. That scene between her and her dad after the dance was handled with tenderness and honesty.
cdouglas wrote:Good: Planes, Trains and Automobiles
Bad: Uncle Buck
Ugly: Curly Sue
J.M. Vargas wrote:I really can'y bring myself to rank the Hughes-directed movies because (a) I haven't seen most of them (and have no inclination to do so) and (b) when I think Hughes I think mostly of the stuff he wrote (which more than quadruples his directorial output). Like the Paul Schrader podcast I wish you guys had made a special separate Good/Bad/Ugly ranking Hughes-scripted/produced movies, because limiting it to the movies he directed excludes detail-rich work like "Home Alone," the "Vacation" movies and "Dutch" (kidding!).
Also, the 'Michael Wincott as ____' replacing lead characters in a John Hughes movie killed me (especially Wincott as Curlie Sue). I was on a bus coming back from work and everyone turned around to look at the guy on a coat with a hoodie (which hid the headphones) in the back of the bus laughing his ass off for seemingly no reason whatsoever.
mavrach wrote:We went the whole Michael Bay episode without mentioning Kim Coates once, and he was in a few of Bay's movies too!
Return to They Came From the North
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests