Bond 22 has a director

New or old, regardless of format, we love talking about movies and the people who make them

Bond 22 has a director

Postby Michael Stailey » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:09 pm

Variety reports that Marc Forster (Finding Neverland, Stranger Than Fiction) will helm the 22nd film in the Bond franchise, and the second with Daniel Craig as 007.
User avatar
Michael Stailey
Chief Justice
 
Posts: 277
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 6:36 am
Location: Marina del Rey, CA

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby HGervais » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:17 pm

Interesting choice. Stranger Than Fiction was one of the best movies from last year. Seems they are following the same path they took with Pierce Brosnan. Open up with Martin Campbell and then move on to an eclectic list of directors not really known for action movies.
"The most dementing of all modern sins: the inability to distinquish excellence from success."-David Hare
User avatar
HGervais
Judge
 
Posts: 4725
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:14 am
Location: Greater New Orleans

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby Belmondo » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:18 pm

Speaking of the number 22, that's about the number of minutes that should have been cut from CASINO ROYALE to make a lean, mean, never look at your watch, Bond movie.
I'm ducking for cover now, so tell me I'm wrong, as usual.
Belmondo
City Attorney
 
Posts: 479
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:17 am
Location: cape cod

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby HGervais » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:22 pm

Belmondo wrote:Speaking of the number 22, that's about the number of minutes that should have been cut from CASINO ROYALE to make a lean, mean, never look at your watch, Bond movie.
I'm ducking for cover now, so tell me I'm wrong, as usual.

Why duck for cover? Pretty much every Bond movie since Goldfinger could stand to lose 20 to 30 minutes. Personally, I found it less noticeable in Casino Royale than I have in any 007 movie in the past 20 years. At least they were taking the time on backstory & character development.
"The most dementing of all modern sins: the inability to distinquish excellence from success."-David Hare
User avatar
HGervais
Judge
 
Posts: 4725
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:14 am
Location: Greater New Orleans

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby BrettCullum » Wed Jun 20, 2007 12:26 pm

And rumor has it a cameo with Vesper Lynd coming back in a prerecorded Internet message.
I'm thinking they will go with the RISIKO title.
The concept is they will continue Bond's evolution.
Alex: It's funny how the colors of the real world only seem really real when you viddy them on the screen. (Clockwork Orange)
User avatar
BrettCullum
Judge
 
Posts: 1669
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2004 4:11 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby B5Erik » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:14 pm

Not my first choice (Alex Proyas was), but certainly an interesting choice with a lot of potential.

Hopefully he unerstands the need for pacing and gets the action sequences done right. We'll see.
User avatar
B5Erik
City Attorney
 
Posts: 358
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 6:05 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby mkiker2089 » Wed Jun 20, 2007 9:16 pm

Belmondo wrote:Speaking of the number 22, that's about the number of minutes that should have been cut from CASINO ROYALE to make a lean, mean, never look at your watch, Bond movie.
I'm ducking for cover now, so tell me I'm wrong, as usual.


Spoiler, no fancy white text just stop reading

-----------------------------

I get that near the end we were supposed to feel him revert to a weaker more emotional self, but did they have to spend 20 minutes watching him ride around in a boat with the girl. Couldn't they have let the adventure they had been through be enough to set the idea. I skip that part when I watch the dvd.

That's where On Her Majesty's Secret Service did it better. The split the "romance" up and gave it less screen time even combined that CR did but the impact was still the same.
-Marshall-
Nun sacciu, nun vidi, nun ceru e si ceru durmiv.
I know nothing, I see nothing, I wasn't there,
and if I was there, I was asleep.
User avatar
mkiker2089
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1372
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 1:45 am
Location: Utopia

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby Shmoooooo » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:23 pm

I just finished watching Casino Royal for the first time ... seriously ... it couldn't be more then 20 minutes since the movie ended ... in all honesty I thought it may have been the best Bond ever. The action was great ... I mean really great ... the girls were sexy ... and Vesper was able to match Bond wit for wit ... that was cool ... The poker scenes kicked ass ... and there were a couple cool twists in it. Daniel Craig is an amazing choice for Bond ... his first outing was way better the any of Bronson's movies (although I still think that was more to the fact that those movies were poorly written/directed as opposed to acted.) The whole reboot idea worked enormously, I can't remember the last time I was this pleased with a new Bond film ... I don't think I ever have been. Whatever they are doing ... keep it up ... Bond has never been better. (And I'm a Bond fan from way back ... previous to this (and I may still change my mind on Casino Royal ... it is only the first time I've seen it after all) my favorite was Goldfinger, acted by my favorite Bond, Connery.)
Shmoooooo
City Attorney
 
Posts: 299
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 6:48 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby mavrach » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:53 pm

SPOILERS


The last 20 minutes of Casino Royale struck me as odd, because it was 20 minutes more than the rest of the Bond movies as far as the story goes. I mean, all the rest end with Bond in bed with the girl (aside from OHMSS of course) and having beaten the bad guys. This one doesn't stop there, kills the girl off and has another battle. It almost explained why that girl never makes it to the next movie!
+1. this is very interesting.
User avatar
mavrach
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1695
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 11:41 am
Location: North Jersey, at the end of a one-way dead-end road.

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby Rob Lineberger » Thu Jun 21, 2007 6:24 am

There's a simple explanation for the pacing and final act of Casino Royale. The book is about 1/4" thick and well worth a read. If you haven't read it, do so and revel in how masterful an adaptation they created.
"I believe the world is 30 years old. It was created for me and will cease to exist when I do. Food has no taste until I bite it and the sun exists solely for my leisure." -- Marshall
User avatar
Rob Lineberger
Judge (Retired)
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 1:47 pm
Location: Durham, NC

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby Pere Jules » Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:45 am

I wish they had kept Martin Campbell, but I'm willing to give Marc Forster the benefit of the doubt. I'm just enormously relieved they didn't pick Tony Scott.
User avatar
Pere Jules
City Attorney
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2003 4:28 pm
Location: Los Angeles

Re: Bond 22 has a director

Postby Tinderbox » Thu Jun 21, 2007 3:59 pm

Casino Royale had a long running time, but I enjoyed and savored every minute of it. And this is coming from someone who has hated 95% of the Bond films since Octopussy. I have no problem with length as long as there is content, and CS had it in spades.
"I did not achieve this position in life by having some snot-nosed punk leave my cheese out in the wind." - Ed Rooney
User avatar
Tinderbox
City Attorney
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Houston, Texas


Return to Movies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron