Stubblecat wrote:In the spirit of Zark's 'Ask A Canadian" thread, I feel we citizens of The Big Dominion need some questions answered about your crazy, mixed-up country.
Here are a few that come to mind:
1. If you and the Missus go to a hospital and have a baby, do you get a bill in the mail the next month? And how much would it cost?
2. How easy is it to purchase a handgun from a gun shop? Here in Canada it's a massive ordeal involving taking a handgun course, joining a gun club, having a sponsor log your time at said gun club for a full year, being voted into full membership at said club, having the club sign off paperwork which allows you to transport a gun from your home to the club (and nowhere else. That requires more paperwork) and then the actual purchase of the gun which involes a waiting period...
3. Does your average 7-11 store sell anything harder than beer? Can you buy wine or hard liquor?
4. Has anyone here tried the Wal-Mart store-brand wine that sells for just a few dollars? I seem to recall something called 2-Buck Chuck.
5. What the hell is with NASCAR? Am I missing something here? It seems just kind of like 'Drive a bit... Take a left... Drive some more... Take another left...'
6. When you watch television without anything fancy like a satellite dish or premium service, how many channels do you get? Do you just plug in your TV and get a good dozen channels or so? What we call 'cable' in Canada is I guess what you call 'broadcast' in the U.S. We have to pay about $40 a month just to see the standard stuff like ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, etc...
Stubblecat wrote:Interesting...
So how much does medical insurance cost per month? Do most employers offer it?
Stubblecat wrote:Why do so many Americans seem to hate Puerto Rico so much? Here in Canada, we'd be desperately happy to have a tropical territory where our money is good. We're trying to appropriate Turks and Caicos. I'm guessing there something about Puerto Rican immigration and culture that might rub some people the wrong way...
Stubblecat wrote:What does the average American think about Canada? I sense there's a bit of xenophobia about other countries sometimes, but maybe that's just my perception.

Stubblecat wrote:So how much does medical insurance cost per month? Do most employers offer it?
Stubblecat wrote:Why do so many Americans seem to hate Puerto Rico so much?
Stubblecat wrote:1. If you and the Missus go to a hospital and have a baby, do you get a bill in the mail the next month? And how much would it cost?
2. How easy is it to purchase a handgun from a gun shop? Here in Canada it's a massive ordeal involving taking a handgun course, joining a gun club, having a sponsor log your time at said gun club for a full year, being voted into full membership at said club, having the club sign off paperwork which allows you to transport a gun from your home to the club (and nowhere else. That requires more paperwork) and then the actual purchase of the gun which involes a waiting period...
3. Does your average 7-11 store sell anything harder than beer? Can you buy wine or hard liquor?
4. Has anyone here tried the Wal-Mart store-brand wine that sells for just a few dollars? I seem to recall something called 2-Buck Chuck.
5. What the hell is with NASCAR? Am I missing something here? It seems just kind of like 'Drive a bit... Take a left... Drive some more... Take another left...'
6. When you watch television without anything fancy like a satellite dish or premium service, how many channels do you get? Do you just plug in your TV and get a good dozen channels or so? What we call 'cable' in Canada is I guess what you call 'broadcast' in the U.S. We have to pay about $40 a month just to see the standard stuff like ABC, NBC, CBS, Fox, etc...
Stubblecat wrote:Interesting...
1. So how much does medical insurance cost per month? Do most employers offer it?
2. Why do so many Americans seem to hate Puerto Rico so much? Here in Canada, we'd be desperately happy to have a tropical territory where our money is good. We're trying to appropriate Turks and Caicos. I'm guessing there something about Puerto Rican immigration and culture that might rub some people the wrong way...
3.What does the average American think about Canada? I sense there's a bit of xenophobia about other countries sometimes, but maybe that's just my perception.
molly1216 wrote:the rules depends on the state..then there are gun shows where you can walk in and buy a gun and wave a false ID at someone who won't be running any checks. Authorities estimate that between 25 and 50 percent of vendors at gun shows are unlicensed.(i looked this up)
chris_mcclinch wrote:molly1216 wrote:the rules depends on the state..then there are gun shows where you can walk in and buy a gun and wave a false ID at someone who won't be running any checks. Authorities estimate that between 25 and 50 percent of vendors at gun shows are unlicensed.(i looked this up)
Yes and no. I may be the only regular gun show attender and purchaser here in the forums, and I can tell you that all three handgun purchases I've made at gun shows involved the nice people holding onto my driver's license until the background check came back with a clear police record. My most recent rifle purchase didn't involve a check, but it didn't involve a request for my ID either. This was what opponents of gun shows would call an unlicensed vendor and what everyone else would call a private sale. I bought a World War II issue bolt-action rifle from a collector who was selling off a couple of pieces and rented a table at the gun show because it's easier than taking out a classified ad or putting up flyers at work.
molly1216 wrote:actually i am never as worried about illegal gun sales as the legal ones.
most of the folks in my neck of the woods tend to get shot with legal ones.
even 8 year olds are killing themselves with perfectly legal Uzi's
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,444180,00.html
Yeah. "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" may be trite, but it's true. If you're the sort of person who's going to misuse a firearm, you're probably going to get a gun somehow. What's really needed is education on gun safety. They tell kids never to play around with a gun, but inevitably some are stupid enough to do it. If they knew to check the chamber as well as the clip, they'd be able to tell if a gun was loaded or not. I read somewhere that that's what causes most gun accidents, that people eject the clip and don't realize there still may be a round in the chamber. Mind, I don't know if that's true.chris_mcclinch wrote:molly1216 wrote:actually i am never as worried about illegal gun sales as the legal ones.
most of the folks in my neck of the woods tend to get shot with legal ones.
even 8 year olds are killing themselves with perfectly legal Uzi's
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,444180,00.html
I remember this story well, and I remember thinking that both instructor and dad were criminally negligent. There's no way you put a firearm more powerful than a .22 in the hands of an 8-year-old, and even then you make sure the kid has the weapon on a bench rest and your hand (or the instructor's) ready to control the muzzle in case recoil spooks him. That's just common sense. Unfortunately, as with driver's licenses and the right to vote, there's no requirement that you pass an IQ test to buy a firearm. This is a tragedy, but the solution isn't to make it more difficult to legally buy a firearm.
Zanarkand wrote:In that case, the answer is: Because

Steve T Power wrote:As someone who's a bit of a self-proclaimed "gun nut", firearms laws in the US make me want to vomit. No offense to Chris or other collectors - but the idea of everyone with a valid driver's license being able to purchase a handgun terrifies the crap out of me. One thing i truly feel Britain and, to a lesser extent, Canada have been doing 100 percent totally right. There's ZERO reason why anyone outside of military or law enforcement/security should own a handgun or concealable weapon, and where security guards/rent-a-cops are concerned, when they aren't working, said firearms should be secured in a weapons locker at their place of employment.
Very un-American of me to say it - but that's one area where the constitution totally effed up.
Future Man wrote:Why is US gun violence so utterly out of proportion to that of so many other countries? I think it's largely because of easier access to guns.
Future Man wrote:People may kill people, but discharging a gun is too much like pushing a button to have the same inherent deterrent that other dangerous instrumentalities have.
Future Man wrote:Countrywide handgun bans in other countries affect the criminal as well as the law-abiding.
Future Man wrote:A handgun ban in, say, New York that is not mirrored in a neighboring state teaches us nothing about what a countrywide ban would do. Although we are far past the point of putting the toothpaste back in the tube, I don't think that a nationwide ban on assault weapons, and for that matter any high-capacity handgun, is unreasonable nor would it have been unthinkable to our muzzle-loading forefathers.
chris_mcclinch wrote:Steve T Power wrote:As someone who's a bit of a self-proclaimed "gun nut", firearms laws in the US make me want to vomit. No offense to Chris or other collectors - but the idea of everyone with a valid driver's license being able to purchase a handgun terrifies the crap out of me. One thing i truly feel Britain and, to a lesser extent, Canada have been doing 100 percent totally right. There's ZERO reason why anyone outside of military or law enforcement/security should own a handgun or concealable weapon, and where security guards/rent-a-cops are concerned, when they aren't working, said firearms should be secured in a weapons locker at their place of employment.
Very un-American of me to say it - but that's one area where the constitution totally effed up.
No offense taken, but "everyone with a valid driver's license" is not permitted to own a handgun. People with felony convictions, and people with convictions for misdemeanors involving stalking, violence, or threats of violence are justly prohibited from purchasing or owning firearms. People whose records are clear of these crimes are judged to have demonstrated sufficient judgment to this point in their lives to be trusted with a deadly weapon. And I'm okay with that.
What I'm not okay with is disarming the law-abiding. My handguns present no threat to me or to anyone else, they currently don't leave my house except to go to the range (I haven't bothered getting a concealed carry permit), and I'd be upset if they were criminalized or taken from me without my having done anything to justify it. This is doubly true because handgun bans affect only the law-abiding. Passing a handgun ban will do NOTHING to take handguns out of the hands of the people who use them to prey on others; it will only disarm their potential victims.
chris_mcclinch wrote:molly1216 wrote:the rules depends on the state..then there are gun shows where you can walk in and buy a gun and wave a false ID at someone who won't be running any checks. Authorities estimate that between 25 and 50 percent of vendors at gun shows are unlicensed.(i looked this up)
Yes and no. I may be the only regular gun show attender and purchaser here in the forums
Dunnyman wrote:chris_mcclinch wrote:molly1216 wrote:the rules depends on the state..then there are gun shows where you can walk in and buy a gun and wave a false ID at someone who won't be running any checks. Authorities estimate that between 25 and 50 percent of vendors at gun shows are unlicensed.(i looked this up)
Yes and no. I may be the only regular gun show attender and purchaser here in the forums
Not quite. Get ready to have the shock of your life. I not only regularly attend shows, but have a decent collection of firearms. Yep, this commie-pinko is armed to the teeth. I've got three different pistols, and nine rifles (I love bolt actions from the WW1 era) and I'll freely admit that the laws we have are kind of messed up with no real solution in sight. Steve, you say that there should be no need for a pistol, but when I ran my t-shirt company, I routinely would carry 2-8 thousand in cash to the shirt warehouses because they'd never accept checks. These warehouses were for the most part located in some pretty rough places, and I had my concealed permit for my own security. I was a gunner's mate in the US Navy, and I know safety and secure handling of firearms quite well. Without that concealed permit, I was going to be killed most likely in a robbery or I would have had to rely on UPS and lose three to five days in transit. I was no danger to anyone else, but the thousands of punks running in Oakland were certainly a danger to me, and I felt a lot better. As long as the person is checked thoroughly, passes all the required safety exams and courses, there should be no reason why they can't purchase a handgun. They have their uses, target shooting mainly, and handguns have their place in hunting as backup.
I think the fault in our Constitution was in allowing the states to set their own laws, and furthermore some states allow different laws within cities and counties. I was stunned to find out in Texas I could buy a friggen' AK-47 with only a valid ID! (this was sometime ago) whereas I could only buy vintage rifles in California with ID, anything new or current required a waiting period.
The whole ugly problem though is that the criminals don't care about the laws. There's enough people out there with guns that I don't trust, that if they start banning guns, I'm going to ignore the laws then. I'd rather break the law than be dead.
Steve T Power wrote:Dunnyman wrote:Not quite. Get ready to have the shock of your life. I not only regularly attend shows, but have a decent collection of firearms. Yep, this commie-pinko is armed to the teeth. I've got three different pistols, and nine rifles (I love bolt actions from the WW1 era) and I'll freely admit that the laws we have are kind of messed up with no real solution in sight. Steve, you say that there should be no need for a pistol, but when I ran my t-shirt company, I routinely would carry 2-8 thousand in cash to the shirt warehouses because they'd never accept checks. These warehouses were for the most part located in some pretty rough places, and I had my concealed permit for my own security. I was a gunner's mate in the US Navy, and I know safety and secure handling of firearms quite well. Without that concealed permit, I was going to be killed most likely in a robbery or I would have had to rely on UPS and lose three to five days in transit. I was no danger to anyone else, but the thousands of punks running in Oakland were certainly a danger to me, and I felt a lot better. As long as the person is checked thoroughly, passes all the required safety exams and courses, there should be no reason why they can't purchase a handgun. They have their uses, target shooting mainly, and handguns have their place in hunting as backup.
I think the fault in our Constitution was in allowing the states to set their own laws, and furthermore some states allow different laws within cities and counties. I was stunned to find out in Texas I could buy a friggen' AK-47 with only a valid ID! (this was sometime ago) whereas I could only buy vintage rifles in California with ID, anything new or current required a waiting period.
The whole ugly problem though is that the criminals don't care about the laws. There's enough people out there with guns that I don't trust, that if they start banning guns, I'm going to ignore the laws then. I'd rather break the law than be dead.
A-ha! You're real name is John Milius isn't it! *wink* It all makes sense now!
chris_mcclinch wrote:Hell may just have frozen over. Greg and I see 100% eye-to-eye on a political issue that tends to cleave along liberal-conservative lines.
Zanarkand wrote:Dan, If you know that much about Oakland, then you know that you need to have an armored car as well.![]()
Were you a Bay Area resident at one point?
Zanarkand wrote:Cool! What did you think? You may be a Georgian at heart, but I bet you liked it. Did you?
Dan Mancini wrote:Zanarkand wrote:Cool! What did you think? You may be a Georgian at heart, but I bet you liked it. Did you?
Actually, I'm a Chicagoan at heart (I've only lived in the ATL for 11 years) but, yeah, I love the Bay Area. It's been a while since I've been out that way because most of my family has moved to Vegas.
Dan Mancini wrote:Zanarkand wrote:Cool! What did you think? You may be a Georgian at heart, but I bet you liked it. Did you?
Actually, I'm a Chicagoan at heart (I've only lived in the ATL for 11 years) but, yeah, I love the Bay Area. It's been a while since I've been out that way because most of my family has moved to Vegas.
Dunnyman wrote:What parts? I was a San Jose guy for the most part, but lived in Palo Alto, Fremont and Campbell.
Zanarkland wrote:Dan I wonder: what was your impression of California before you came for the first time? No doubt you were
expecting freaks and gay people all over the place.
Dan Mancini wrote:Dunnyman wrote:What parts? I was a San Jose guy for the most part, but lived in Palo Alto, Fremont and Campbell.
Walnut Creek, Antioch, Pittsburg, and San Jose mostly.
Dunnyman wrote:I love bolt actions from the WW1 era
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests