Name that artifact!

Upcoming DVD Release news, your reviews, your collections, bargain hunting

Name that artifact!

Postby Andrew Forbes » Tue Nov 10, 2009 8:22 pm

Technical question time. I was watching Anchor Bay's DVD of Trauma (shut up, bear with me) and noticed a strange video effect in some scenes that I've only encountered once before (in cut-rate releases of Raw Deal and T-Men). Occasionally, in dark, mostly still shots, an element of the scene (usually in deep shadow) will "float" with the minor camera movement. I'll try to explain. Imagine a scene features a person in a room, with a red rose pinned to their shirt. The shot is, for all intents and purposes, free of camera movement, but there is some relative motion between the frame and the content because it's a hand-held shot or the camera is bumped or there is some frame jumping. Most of the scene is fine, but the red rose smudges around with the movement of the frame relative to the scene, as though locked to the camera.

So, three questions: 1) Does anyone know what the hell I'm talking about; 2) Has anyone encountered it before; and 3) What is this phenomenon called?
Formerly chamucamel
User avatar
Andrew Forbes
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 2615
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: Name that artifact!

Postby mkiker2089 » Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:49 pm

no to all three but I wonder if it's a compression artifact or if it's overexposure in the camera / film itself. It sounds similar to what they used to call "blooming" where if the contrast was too high in a scene the brightest points would seem to distort out of focus.
-Marshall-
Nun sacciu, nun vidi, nun ceru e si ceru durmiv.
I know nothing, I see nothing, I wasn't there,
and if I was there, I was asleep.
User avatar
mkiker2089
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1372
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 1:45 am
Location: Utopia

Re: Name that artifact!

Postby Steve T Power » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:09 am

Andrew Forbes wrote:Technical question time. I was watching Anchor Bay's DVD of Trauma (shut up, bear with me) and noticed a strange video effect in some scenes that I've only encountered once before (in cut-rate releases of Raw Deal and T-Men). Occasionally, in dark, mostly still shots, an element of the scene (usually in deep shadow) will "float" with the minor camera movement. I'll try to explain. Imagine a scene features a person in a room, with a red rose pinned to their shirt. The shot is, for all intents and purposes, free of camera movement, but there is some relative motion between the frame and the content because it's a hand-held shot or the camera is bumped or there is some frame jumping. Most of the scene is fine, but the red rose smudges around with the movement of the frame relative to the scene, as though locked to the camera.

So, three questions: 1) Does anyone know what the hell I'm talking about; 2) Has anyone encountered it before; and 3) What is this phenomenon called?


It could be a contrast/human eye issue - like with some flicks how white on black text appears to be getting larger even though it isn't.

I could be crazy. Or you could be crazy - perhaps we're all crazy.
As the ancient Tibetan philosophy states:"Don't start none... won't be none...".
User avatar
Steve T Power
Judge
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, CA

Re: Name that artifact!

Postby Andrew Forbes » Wed Nov 11, 2009 12:39 pm

Steve T Power wrote:It could be a contrast/human eye issue - like with some flicks how white on black text appears to be getting larger even though it isn't.

I could be crazy. Or you could be crazy - perhaps we're all crazy.

It is definitely not an illusion. It is happening on screen. I'll get back to you on the crazy.
Formerly chamucamel
User avatar
Andrew Forbes
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 2615
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: Name that artifact!

Postby Future Man » Wed Nov 11, 2009 2:16 pm

This probably doesn't lend itself to screen capture?
Future Man
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1884
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 9:05 pm

Re: Name that artifact!

Postby Andrew Forbes » Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:05 pm

Future Man wrote:This probably doesn't lend itself to screen capture?

Sadly, no.
Formerly chamucamel
User avatar
Andrew Forbes
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 2615
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: Name that artifact!

Postby Jim_Thomas » Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:22 am

Could be a side effect of aggressive edge enhancement. I ran across a similar situation in Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo, with a character wearing a houndstooth dress.
Jim_Thomas
Judge
 
Posts: 431
Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:40 am

Re: Name that artifact!

Postby hoytereden » Thu Nov 12, 2009 10:33 am

Jim_Thomas wrote:Could be a side effect of aggressive edge enhancement. I ran across a similar situation in Thirty Seconds Over Tokyo, with a character wearing a houndstooth dress.


Van Johnson? :shock: Don't tell me he pulled an Ed Wood and bombed Japan wearing a dress under his uniform! :lol:
"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead"-Stan Laurel
Moe-"Were you scared?" Larry-"No, just apprehensive." Moe-"Apprehensive, that's a pretty big word.What's it mean?" Larry-"That's scared with a college education!"
User avatar
hoytereden
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 5:24 pm
Location: The Big Island of Hawaii


Return to DVD

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests