AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

New or old, regardless of format, we love talking about movies and the people who make them

AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby J.M. Vargas » Sat Jul 31, 2010 8:31 pm

What? WHAAAAT??!! :)

Chantal Akerman's Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles (1975) on Criterion DVD for the first time. The first 20 minutes of this 201 min. long movie were sheer torture as Akerman's mise-en-scène (static camera angles, no music, lengthy shots, etc.) became clear; I just didn't know if I could take three more hours of THIS. Then around the hour mark something clicked when I realized I was fascinated by the way Jeanne was folding papers and lenin in the exact same way/pattern. Minor deviations from established routines (a dropped utensil, a light left on in an empty room, etc.) felt like a gun going off in a quiet library. By the third hour I was literally thinking of the million different ways the mounting cracks in Jeanne's everyday routines around her home could doom her. "Jeanne Dielman" is a triumph of turning the discarded moments from most narrative films (the stuff screenwriters don't even bother thinking about) into a cinematic world of its own. I loved the static cameras not tipping us at all about how Chantal felt one way or another (very Ozu-like but in a disquieting and discomforting way). When Jeanne first does a reverse-camera shot from across the kitchen I literally screamed 'Holy S***.' The movie's title isn't just the movie's title or the location in which 90% of the "story" takes place. It's the whole of this character's life since her previous routine (hinted at in infrequent, cold conversations with her son Sylvain) went away, the only thing in her life she can lean on. This makes the finale all the more powerful because the last couple of scenes are lengthy-enough to make us contemplate (just like Jeanne is) what will become of her and those around her when the routine stuff that used to be taken for granted resonates for its absence in the lives of those it used to affect.

Akerman asks a lot of her audience, some of whom may not be physically/emotionally ready for this type of movie. Those with the patience and tenacity to stick through it will be deeply rewarded with a movie that's both traditional and completely avant-garde. There are lengthier movie epics ("The Human Condition," "Gone With the Wind," etc.) but none as intimate and confined to as small a cast, physical space and human dimension as this one. "Jeanne Dielman" is packed with lengthy-enough scenes that allow one to imagine what it's static shots and minute attention to detail would look like in high-def Blu-ray. And that, my friends, makes me a sad panda that my first experience with "Jeanne Dielman" had to be a compressed-to-fit-in-one-disc DVD. On a BD disc (or a 35mm screening, whichever's closest) this already-strong experience's immersion would increase tenfold, especially if you manage to ignore the obvious hints of where things are headed toward the end. Master-freaking-piece!

MST3K KTMA-05: Gamera (1988/1965) on DVD for the first time. An odd-even-by-KTMA-standards early “MST3K” episode with a single riffer (Joel) in the theater, which at least proves how needed the bots are for the human host (Joel or Mike) to bounce off from. Jokes are so sparse and infrequent that a hearty laugh from Joel when the scientist mentions Gamera’s “special organs that operate like a hydro-electric plant” (!) qualifies as a highlight. Ted Turner gets slammed pretty hard in the host segments for his then-crusade to colorize old movies and it was neat to see how Gamera’s flying turtle effect was done by simple hand-drawn animation in the first movie (instead of the ‘elaborate’ effects used in latter ‘Gamera’ movies). Even kind and gentle Joel begins to tire of Kenny’s turtle-loving antics, taking some mean swipes at the annoying on-screen kid as the movie unfolds. I can only imagine the abuse The Brains unleashed on this flick (and Kenny) when they got a second chance to do it right in MST3K's official season 3 ragging of the same movie. This one is definitely only for the diehard MiSTie completist.
'You can't make chicken salad out of chicken s***'
User avatar
J.M. Vargas
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 3083
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 6:23 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby mavrach » Sat Jul 31, 2010 11:35 pm

Straw Dogs Criterion - Loved it. I didn't think it was as dark as I'd been warned, and was drawn into the gradual buildup towards the end.

This was also my first Sam Peckinpah movie. It feels a little odd to pick this as his first, since he's known mostly for westerns. But I'm in and want to see some more. I'm looking at the unwatched copy of The Wild Bunch on my shelf now.



I need to start watching more of these dozens of DVD's I own but haven't seen yet. I mean this was sitting on my shelf for 3 years and I never got to it. I think there are a few more gems in there that I'll beat myself up for having skipped. We've just had so little time to watch movies in general, and have so many older ones that we love. It's hard to find the time to get to all of these, and I still keep buying more!
+1. this is very interesting.
User avatar
mavrach
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 11:41 am
Location: North Jersey, at the end of a one-way dead-end road.

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Future Man » Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:53 am

North Face
Based-on-fact German mountain-climbing nailbiter did have me literally biting my nails by the end but somehow it was not as compelling overall as I had anticipated based on reviews.
Future Man
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1884
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 9:05 pm

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby molly1216 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 7:48 am

Testament of Dr Mabuse (1933) I am having a seriously hard time accepting that this is a 1933 film. Lang and the german cinema were so far ahead of what we were doing. And I can certainly see why it was banned by the incoming political regime.
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?" - Douglas Adams
User avatar
molly1216
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:43 pm
Location: methuen, ma

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Steve T Power » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:33 am

mavrach wrote:Straw Dogs Criterion - Loved it. I didn't think it was as dark as I'd been warned, and was drawn into the gradual buildup towards the end.

This was also my first Sam Peckinpah movie. It feels a little odd to pick this as his first, since he's known mostly for westerns. But I'm in and want to see some more. I'm looking at the unwatched copy of The Wild Bunch on my shelf now.



I need to start watching more of these dozens of DVD's I own but haven't seen yet. I mean this was sitting on my shelf for 3 years and I never got to it. I think there are a few more gems in there that I'll beat myself up for having skipped. We've just had so little time to watch movies in general, and have so many older ones that we love. It's hard to find the time to get to all of these, and I still keep buying more!


I like my "bloody" Sam a lot. The Wild Bunch, Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid and The Getaway are all concentrated awesome. Ride The High Country Is mighty fine as well. I've only seen the old butchered version of Major Dundee, so I can't entirely vouch for it, though I do have the uncut restored version sitting on the shelf.
As the ancient Tibetan philosophy states:"Don't start none... won't be none...".
User avatar
Steve T Power
Judge
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, CA

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby HGervais » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:26 am

Make sure you find a copy of Bring Me The Head Of Alfredo Garcia. It is essential Peckinpah.
"The most dementing of all modern sins: the inability to distinquish excellence from success."-David Hare
User avatar
HGervais
Judge
 
Posts: 4725
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:14 am
Location: Greater New Orleans

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby BenShultz » Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:11 am

HGervais wrote:Make sure you find a copy of Bring Me The Head Of Alfredo Garcia. It is essential Peckinpah.


QFMFT.
Oh, you're paying way too much for worms, man. Who's your worm guy?
User avatar
BenShultz
City Prosecutor
 
Posts: 863
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2004 1:49 pm
Location: Delmar, MD

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby yellow ledbetter » Sun Aug 01, 2010 4:26 pm

money's been tight, on account of I just moved outta state, so I've been rewatching old favorites. This week it's been The Proposition, Apocalypto, The Cable Guy and The Prestige
yellow ledbetter
Paralegal
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:13 pm

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Bryan Pope » Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:34 am

We spent 10 hours in the car this weekend, all of which was spent watching (or listening to, in my case) Disney's The Sword in the Stone. I swear we must have watched/listened to that thing eight times.

Netflix sent us Dead and Buried, a fun little horror flick from the early '80s.

They also sent us Away We Go and The Blind Side. Haven't watched those yet.

But the movie that REALLY has us talking is Inception. Wow, what a well-crafted story. I don't know how Nolan kept all those balls in the air without dropping a single one. One of the extremely rare instances where eye candy merges with masterful storytelling.
Agnes, it's me...Billy.
User avatar
Bryan Pope
Judge
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 10:44 am
Location: Texas

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Dunnyman » Tue Aug 03, 2010 12:40 am

Just came back from Dinner For Schmucks, and what a weirdly wonderful movie it is. This is not your typical Carell flick, nor is it anything you'd expect from Jay Roach directing. It's not the kind of movie that you're laughing out loud in the theater, but on the way home as you replay parts of it in your mind, you're laughing hysterically. Must see, as Rudd and Carell bounce off of each other nicely as they did in 40 Year Old Virgin and relative newcomer Stephanie Szostak is charming as Rudd's love interest, plus an extremely talented cast of characters rounds it out.
"I ain't a boy, no I'm a man, and I believe in the Promised Land"
-Coming to the USA on January 20, 2009!
User avatar
Dunnyman
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1777
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 12:37 am
Location: Seattle

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby J.M. Vargas » Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:14 pm

Yasujiro Ozu's Brothers and Sisters of the Toda Family (1941) at IFC Center's OZU Retrospective for the first time. A dress rehearsal (tryout?) for the ideas/premise that Ozu would bring back with a vengeance in "Tokyo Story," this early 40's drama looks with detachment (and infrequent bursts of humor) at how the siblings of a wealthy family shuttle their widow mother and unmarried younger sister from one place to another. By Ozu's standards the tongue-lashing that Shojiro (Shin Saburi) gives his siblings after he confronts them with their treatment of their mother/sister must rank as one of the filmmaker's most overtly intense moments. Even if Ozu didn't know it at the time he made "B&SoftheTD," the fates of Momma Toda, Setsuko and Shojiro (by implication) end up far better than their relatives that valued their wealth and properties... in Japan... during World War II. 8)

Jean-Pierre Melville's L'aîné des Ferchaux (AKA Magnet of Doom, 1963) on R4 French DVD for the first time. This forgotten Melville road movie is nearly impossible to track down and is mostly unseen; had to import a Region 4 DVD w/o English subtitles and then read-along the English dialogue from a translated transcript I downloaded/printed from the internet. Nice anamorphic transfer that's watchable but clearly taken from a fading, deteriorating print. Jean-Paul Belmondo plays a down-on-his luck, Frank Sinatra-adoring boxer that tags along as the personal assistant to a shady banker (Charles Vanel) that has hidden loot in America that must be retrieved and kept secret. Though most of this 100 min. movie takes place in U.S. soil (tons of 2nd unit early 60's footage of NYC, Hoboken and New Orleans) the awful supporting actors, shoddy editing and awkward camera angles (to hide that most of the flick was shot in France) reveal a predictably downbeat story getting stretched way too thin. All the elements you expect from Melville are present (Belmondo and Vanel delivering good performances, loose women bringing chaos to men's relationships, nihilistic atmosphere, a money score fueling the narrative, etc.) but "L'aîné des Ferchaux" just doesn't come together like "Le Doulos," "Bob Le Flambeur" or the better Melville flicks out on home video. Neither undiscovered masterpiece nor stinking disaster, "L'aîné des Ferchaux" is a curio for Melville fanatics with too much time and money on their hands to have fun tracking down. Like, you know... :?

Autour de Jeanne Dielman (1975/2004) on DVD for the first time. A bonus feature on the "Jeanne Dielman, 23 Quai du Commerce, 1080 Bruxelles" Criterion 2-disc set (see first post on this thread), this is an above-average look at the behind-the-scenes creative process. Seeing a director (Chantal Akerman) and actor (Delphine Seyrig) having both trouble comunicating what they want/need from each other while also showing trust on the other one's instincts (though Chantal ends up brushing aside most of Seyrig's suggestions) turns out to be riveting stuff. Shot in B&W videotape (a rarity back in '74, especially for a low-budget indie French movie) this is an above-average and somewhat intimate peek at an unusual production (don't recall seeing a film crew that was mostly female before).

Galaxina (1980) on HD-DVD. William Sachs and Stephen Macht commentary on because, frankly, I had 90 minutes to kill before a Mexican soccer game, didn't feel like watching something 'heavy' and wanted to test for HD-DVD laptop's HDMI compatibility with my HDTV. It worked, I watched, I forgot. The End. :?

A Room With A View (1985) on HD-DVD. My Spanish-speaking mother is reading E.M. Forster's novel for her English classes (she's learning at 62!) so I rewatched it with the commentary track on so we can talk about it on Skype. Who knows, maybe by year's end my HD-DVD copy of "Room" will find its way into my mom's Toshiba HD-DVD player back in the homeland.

MST3K #820: Space Mutiny (1997/1988) on DVD. In my personal list of favorite "MST3K" episodes this one is always near the top, an unending lithany of dead-on riffs and bullseye-hitting jokes that get funnier and loonier along with the flick. Recycled "Battlestar Galactica" 70's footage + washed-up has-beens (Cameron Mitchell, Reb Brown, John Phillip Law, etc.) + talentless hack director/crew (which keep a killed-on-screen character alive through inept editing) + dated no-budget 80's production values ('graphics by Kenner') + Mike and the Bots at the top of their game = an "MST3K" classic. Never been able to look at railings after seeing this experiment without cracking a big, dorky smile to myself. :D

MST3K #1009: Hamlet (1999/1961) on DVD. After I watched "Space Mutiny" my thirst for "MST3K" wasn't quenched. But, instead of reaching for one of my many unwatched/unopened "MST3K" Box Sets/discs, I watched an episode I'd seen recently (last June actually) that always managed to put me to sleep with its lethargic pace, dreary subject matter (Shakespeare's overrated play) and drab look/performances (dubbed-to-English German made-for-TV production values). SUCCESS!!! The high from "Space Mutiny" kept me wide awake through "Hamlet" and I enjoyed being able to get through the whole thing in one sitting, which I found out makes a world of different. New jokes that I didn't notice or cared for before (like the 'Finnish SCUD missile' sound effects) this time had me rolling on the couch. Guess all I needed to enjoy "Hamlet" all along was the carry-over, G-force pull of a top-notch "MST3K" classic as a lead-in.

Sahara (2005) on HD-DVD. At some JR members' request I rewatched "Sahara" with director Breck Eisner and McConaughey talking (commentary). Nope, sorry, still a steaming pile of missed opportunities (the comic relief guys don't generate any laughs), annoying pop-song montages and three back-to-back action sequences (basically the last quarter of the movie) that should have been more evenly spread to keep the audience (i.e. me) from being so turned off at the halfway mark to make the killer finale moot. From the commentary I can glean "Sahara" is one of those movies that was more fun for the filmmakers to work on than it was for audiences to watch.
'You can't make chicken salad out of chicken s***'
User avatar
J.M. Vargas
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 3083
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 6:23 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Dan Mancini » Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:01 am

I finally caught up with Kick-Ass last night. Wow...uh...color me underwhelmed. I wasn't offended like Ebert, but the entire exercise (stylish as it was) felt unnecessary. The flick (and I'm assuming the comic) isn't anywhere near as subversive or deconstructive as Watchmen. The action was fun, but the last 20 minutes of the flick (which contains most of the best action) felt tacked on to me -- and out of place. The television broadcast was ree-donkulous as was the assault on Mark Strong's penthouse (and I don't mean ree-donkulous in a "we're lampooning how superhero flicks often slide into absurdity during their final acts" sort of way, but painfully earnest ree-donkulousness). I can see how people dig it -- it's stylish as hell -- but it didn't do much for me.
User avatar
Dan Mancini
Chief Prosecutor
 
Posts: 4052
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 7:17 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Steve T Power » Wed Aug 04, 2010 11:26 am

That's ok Danno, i made it about an hour in before I turned it off out of sheer boredom. Vaughn has a great eye, he's a solid talent as a director, but the movie thought it was about six times more clever than it actually was, and , i'm gonna say it, Mark Millar is a goddamn terrible comic book writer.

I know, we'll play up to the super hero cliches by totally emulating them... but it's ok, because we're winking at the audience the whole time. It's kind of like a less "special ed" version of Superhero Movie, only with blood and cuss words.

And yeah, the 12 year old did freak me out... just a little.
As the ancient Tibetan philosophy states:"Don't start none... won't be none...".
User avatar
Steve T Power
Judge
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, CA

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Jon Mercer » Wed Aug 04, 2010 2:41 pm

Steve T Power wrote:I'm gonna say it, Mark Millar is a goddamn terrible comic book writer.


A couple of years ago I would have defended with the retort that under the right editors or with enough tension on his leash, Millar can be enjoyable. Not anymore. His own material (outside of the safety net of Marvel and DC canon) has proved to be mean-spirited, spiteful, and petty. He's like the third Coen brother with the level of disdain he seems to have for his protagonists. I suppose it's a statement about how callous he envisions the world to be, but is it really needed in every story of heroic derring-do the guy has crafted since Marvel 1985? I've blind bought four trades of series he's worked on because I enjoyed Red Son and the first two series of The Ultimates, three of which (Kick-Ass, Wanted, Wolverine: Old Man Logan) have been given away.
User avatar
Jon Mercer
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1203
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2004 10:41 am
Location: St. John's, NL

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby cdouglas » Wed Aug 04, 2010 4:33 pm

Jon Mercer wrote:
Steve T Power wrote:I'm gonna say it, Mark Millar is a goddamn terrible comic book writer.


A couple of years ago I would have defended with the retort that under the right editors or with enough tension on his leash, Millar can be enjoyable. Not anymore. His own material (outside of the safety net of Marvel and DC canon) has proved to be mean-spirited, spiteful, and petty. He's like the third Coen brother with the level of disdain he seems to have for his protagonists. I suppose it's a statement about how callous he envisions the world to be, but is it really needed in every story of heroic derring-do the guy has crafted since Marvel 1985? I've blind bought four trades of series he's worked on because I enjoyed Red Son and the first two series of The Ultimates, three of which (Kick-Ass, Wanted, Wolverine: Old Man Logan) have been given away.


Have we really reached the point where calling something "the third Coen brother" qualifies as an insult? Anyway, I agree that Millar's writing has been lacking in recent years, but in fairness I think the film is a significant improvement on the graphic novel (it's nowhere near as mean-spirited, for one thing).

Also, Dan, maybe I'm reading more into the film than is actually there, but I felt the film's over-the-top final act was indeed a bit of sly satire (particularly in the wake of the film's early attempts to hammer home just how difficult being a superhero actually is on a practical level).
cdouglas
Judge
 
Posts: 957
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:49 am

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby HGervais » Wed Aug 04, 2010 5:28 pm

cdouglas wrote:Have we really reached the point where calling something "the third Coen brother" qualifies as an insult? Anyway, I agree that Millar's writing has been lacking in recent years, but in fairness I think the film is a significant improvement on the graphic novel (it's nowhere near as mean-spirited, for one thing).

Also, Dan, maybe I'm reading more into the film than is actually there, but I felt the film's over-the-top final act was indeed a bit of sly satire (particularly in the wake of the film's early attempts to hammer home just how difficult being a superhero actually is on a practical level).

I think you pretty much nailed it Clark. On the surface Kick Ass works as a straight ahead action-fantasy but under the surface and you have a pretty vicious satire. Repeated viewings pretty much strengthen that aspect of it. Spot-on review btw Clark.
"The most dementing of all modern sins: the inability to distinquish excellence from success."-David Hare
User avatar
HGervais
Judge
 
Posts: 4725
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:14 am
Location: Greater New Orleans

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby azul017 » Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:23 pm

The Ghost Writer - It's an interesting movie, to say the least. Good performances from all around, and very impressive production values. I have to say Polanski went the extra mile to make Germany look like London, New York and Massachusetts -- and it worked. Not the best movie in his canon, but it's certainly a big step up above Oliver Twist and Frantic.
"Aliens conquering Earth would be fine with me, as long as they make me their queen."
- Gillian Anderson
User avatar
azul017
City Prosecutor
 
Posts: 821
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 5:19 am
Location: Durham, NC

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Dan Mancini » Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:15 am

cdouglas wrote:Also, Dan, maybe I'm reading more into the film than is actually there, but I felt the film's over-the-top final act was indeed a bit of sly satire (particularly in the wake of the film's early attempts to hammer home just how difficult being a superhero actually is on a practical level).

I found nothing particularly sly about it. In fact, I thought it was all painfully obvious...and a cop out. I'd agree that Vaughan and Millar were trying for satire, but trying isn't the same thing as achieving.

(SPOILERS in...

5...

4...

3...

2...

1...)

After Big Daddy's death they floundered completely. Instead of doing the hard work of crafting something truly satirical, they got lazy and allowed the climax to devolve in parody instead (and cheap, obvious parody at that -- e.g. "Gee, I wonder how that bazooka will come into play?"). There was no narrative pay-off, and the emotional payoff was no different than the revenge drivel you find in the very genre pictures Vaughan and Millar were supposedly satirizing. So, their point was what exactly?

And I tend to agree with Jon: I think Millar fancies himself his generation's Allen Moore, only he has half the brains and about a quarter of the cojones (and I say that as someone who thinks Moore is generally overrated). If Moore was as conventional as Millar, Watchmen would've ended with Rorschach, Nite Owl, Dr. Manhattan, and Silk Spectre kicking Ozymandius' ass and saving the planet from ruin. And then, having learned the true value of humanity, Dr. Manhattan would have become the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge. (And a pissed off Stephen Hawkin begins plotting his revenge. End credits.)
User avatar
Dan Mancini
Chief Prosecutor
 
Posts: 4052
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 7:17 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Gabriel Girard » Thu Aug 05, 2010 5:25 am

TIm Burton's Alice In Wonderland - Meh, I usually love Burton but his remake phase his wearing thin on me and this feels like his least genuine movie since Planet Of The Apes, although, unlike that one it isn't a total failure. It somehow keeps the spirit of Carroll's work through some dialogue but it has too much of a plot to really feel like Alice and that plot is nowhere near original. Also I wished someone else than Depp had played the Hatter- having him just seems like the same old, same old and probably pushed the scripwriter (or Burton) to give the Hatter a bigger part. The rest of the actors do fine though especially Wasikowska and Bonham Carter, I'll stick with the book or the 1951 animated movie, thanks.

Oh and as far as his adaptations go I prefer Charlie And The Chocolate Factory - but it has some of the same problems as Alice... I'll take Sweeney Todd over both of those any time of the week - way more chutzpah.
User avatar
Gabriel Girard
County Attorney
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: Montréal, Québec

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Steve T Power » Thu Aug 05, 2010 7:45 pm

Valentine's Day - It was saccharine, syrupy, and mushy as hell, it was my second viewing, and i found myself really getting into the variety of characters. Some of the final outcomes were genuinely surprising (i'm lookin at you Julia and Bradley Cooper - pretty nice twists there). Sure it's all about as realistic as Star Wars, but I can't think of a single flick that was better to sit down and watch with my wife on our 4th anniversary. I swear we both got a little choked up at the end. Yeah, we're pansies.

Hate to say it, but by year end it'll probably be in my top 10. One of the worst reviewed movies of the year. And i don't care.
As the ancient Tibetan philosophy states:"Don't start none... won't be none...".
User avatar
Steve T Power
Judge
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, CA

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Boba Fett » Thu Aug 05, 2010 8:18 pm

"The Killer Inside Me"

Sleazy, infinitely disturbing and utterly misogynistic. A must see for fans of pulp novels; unless anything strong is on the horizon, they should just hand Casey Affleck the Best Actor Oscar right now, the guy becomes one of the most vile and still charming characters to ever grace a movie screen.
"I assure you, whatever the others promise to do, when it comes to the showdown, they won't be there."
User avatar
Boba Fett
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 2:11 am
Location: Oregon

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Steve T Power » Thu Aug 05, 2010 9:45 pm

To Kill a Mockingbird - Last time i saw this i was in Junior High and it was on VHS. The musings on race and civil rights may be a tad simple and absurd now, but it's still one hell of a powerful flick that resonates based on the performances, the direction, and the story as told from a child's eyes. Goddamn amazing film. Peck deserved that best actor statue, but Lawrence of Arabia still deserved best pic/best director.

Recently snagged the Universal 2-disc for less than the price of a cup o coffee, man that is one nice disc.
As the ancient Tibetan philosophy states:"Don't start none... won't be none...".
User avatar
Steve T Power
Judge
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, CA

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby cdouglas » Fri Aug 06, 2010 2:59 pm

Dan Mancini wrote:
cdouglas wrote:Also, Dan, maybe I'm reading more into the film than is actually there, but I felt the film's over-the-top final act was indeed a bit of sly satire (particularly in the wake of the film's early attempts to hammer home just how difficult being a superhero actually is on a practical level).

I found nothing particularly sly about it. In fact, I thought it was all painfully obvious...and a cop out. I'd agree that Vaughan and Millar were trying for satire, but trying isn't the same thing as achieving.

(SPOILERS in...

5...

4...

3...

2...

1...)

After Big Daddy's death they floundered completely. Instead of doing the hard work of crafting something truly satirical, they got lazy and allowed the climax to devolve in parody instead (and cheap, obvious parody at that -- e.g. "Gee, I wonder how that bazooka will come into play?"). There was no narrative pay-off, and the emotional payoff was no different than the revenge drivel you find in the very genre pictures Vaughan and Millar were supposedly satirizing. So, their point was what exactly?

And I tend to agree with Jon: I think Millar fancies himself his generation's Allen Moore, only he has half the brains and about a quarter of the cojones (and I say that as someone who thinks Moore is generally overrated). If Moore was as conventional as Millar, Watchmen would've ended with Rorschach, Nite Owl, Dr. Manhattan, and Silk Spectre kicking Ozymandius' ass and saving the planet from ruin. And then, having learned the true value of humanity, Dr. Manhattan would have become the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics at Cambridge. (And a pissed off Stephen Hawkin begins plotting his revenge. End credits.)


Sorry it took so long to respond to this; it's been crazy at work lately.

I felt like the film's efforts at accentuating the absurdity of superheroics on a practical level in the earlier portion of the film was essentially setting us up to read the wildness that happened later in the film as absurd. It's meant in an entirely tongue-in-cheek manner - how can one read the moment of "glorified violence" in which a kid fires machine guns from a jetpack to the strains of Elvis singing "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" as anything other than satire. The film offers cold-blooded murder, soulless behavior, extreme violence involving a young child... all delivered in a manner designed to entertain. This is most notably accentuated during the internet broadcast scene, in which any sense of human decency or sympathy that the viewers of that video should be feeling is crushed by the adrenaline rush they're getting from it. I found it a smart bit of social commentary.

I will agree that the coda seems kinda lame. In fairness, Vaughn feels the same way (he would have ended the film on the rooftop scene, but the studios wanted additional closure and a sequel hook). I won't defend Millar or the comic, as I feel it's meant to be taken at face value. Vaughn takes the basic story and structure of the comic and infuses it with both humanity (almost completely absent from the comic) and subtle satire (which exists alongside Millar's somewhat clumsy, obvious satire).
cdouglas
Judge
 
Posts: 957
Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 10:49 am

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Gabriel Girard » Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:25 am

Defendor - an enjoyable twist on the superhero genre which is more about character than action or comedy. Woody Harrelson rocks this role!
User avatar
Gabriel Girard
County Attorney
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: Montréal, Québec

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Andrew Forbes » Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:32 am

Django, have you always been alone?
Django, have you never loved again?

Random thought: what was with the Italians reusing that same high-pitched gunshot effect ("pshew!") in all their Westerns? I get that these were low-budget flicks, but could they really not pay to record something that didn't sound like a cat sneezing?
Formerly chamucamel
User avatar
Andrew Forbes
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 2615
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 9:43 am
Location: Edmonton, AB

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Bryan Pope » Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:49 am

Watched a double-feature of Finding Nemo and Jaws with my nine-year-old. Both are perfect summer movies. Also watched:

The Blind Side. The storytelling is pat and predictable, and I agree with critics who complained that Michael is written as a bystander in his own life, but Sandra Bullock carries it all the way. She's enormously appealing, as always, but she no more deserved an Oscar for this than Julia Roberts did for Erin Brockovich.

Away We Go. What a fun surprise! A poignant comedy about two intelligent people searching for the best place to raise their soon-to-be-born daughter. Maya Rudolph and that guy from The Office make a winning and believable pair. Good support from Catherine O'Hara, Allison Janney a6nd Maggie Gyllenhaul (sp?).
Agnes, it's me...Billy.
User avatar
Bryan Pope
Judge
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 10:44 am
Location: Texas

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Future Man » Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:07 pm

Black Narcissus (Blu-ray--wow!)
A mesmerizing feast for the eyes and ears.
And now I'm off to explore other Archer productions
Future Man
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1884
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 9:05 pm

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby mavrach » Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:42 pm

Zombi 2 - This was a treat. They went all out on the zombie effects too. Compared to its "prequel" Dawn of the Dead, whose zombies were just gray, these zombies actually looked rotten. Very dreary with a great buildup.

I do have a tough time with the language tracks. As I understand it, this and a lot of Italian films of the time were filmed multi-lingually, so there isn't a true language to watch it on. I was inclined to watch the Italian track, but the lips still didn't sync. Plus it was damned strange to see New Yorkers speaking Italian (outside of Little Italy at least ;-) ). So I ended up going with the English track. There's no win, since I hate dubs.
+1. this is very interesting.
User avatar
mavrach
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 11:41 am
Location: North Jersey, at the end of a one-way dead-end road.

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby molly1216 » Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:49 am

the Crazies (2009) - nice like remake, creepy and bloody but not TOOO over the top with gore and gristle factor..just the way i like it. I think it had a very nice script, straightforward without pretense, characters didnt say a lot of stupid stuff, didn't go overboard on exposition, it let the audience figure things out at the same rate. overall unsuck. Good sturdy B movie. in 5 years i'd watch this again whereas, i don't think we will even remember some of the oversequelized gore fests.
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?" - Douglas Adams
User avatar
molly1216
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:43 pm
Location: methuen, ma

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Steve T Power » Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:12 pm

Bryan Pope wrote:
Away We Go. What a fun surprise! A poignant comedy about two intelligent people searching for the best place to raise their soon-to-be-born daughter. Maya Rudolph and that guy from The Office make a winning and believable pair. Good support from Catherine O'Hara, Allison Janney a6nd Maggie Gyllenhaul (sp?).


I loved this one too. One of my favorites from last year. Glad someone else got on board.
As the ancient Tibetan philosophy states:"Don't start none... won't be none...".
User avatar
Steve T Power
Judge
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, CA

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby molly1216 » Wed Aug 11, 2010 7:22 am

Outlander (2008) which try as it might...did not suck. An hyper-extension of Beowulf and The 13th Warrior..IMHO it was better than either of those. The production values were awesome...the CGI monster was awesome...the dialogue was NOT laughable, and the plot aside from a couple of wonky moments was simple and exciting. (the destruction of the beacon scene should have been shortened to just him smashing it.) But I am still shake my head wondering how James Caviezel manages to get lead roles, he just seems sooooo bland. This film seemed written for Dennis Quaid but Caviezel played it like he was Michael Rennie. :( Definitely a fun little film i would pick up if i saw it for 5 bucks or less. Apparently i wasn't the only one, in the US it went from limited release to DVD.
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?" - Douglas Adams
User avatar
molly1216
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:43 pm
Location: methuen, ma

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Steve T Power » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:36 pm

molly1216 wrote:Outlander (2008) which try as it might...did not suck. An hyper-extension of Beowulf and The 13th Warrior..IMHO it was better than either of those. The production values were awesome...the CGI monster was awesome...the dialogue was NOT laughable, and the plot aside from a couple of wonky moments was simple and exciting. (the destruction of the beacon scene should have been shortened to just him smashing it.) But I am still shake my head wondering how James Caviezel manages to get lead roles, he just seems sooooo bland. This film seemed written for Dennis Quaid but Caviezel played it like he was Michael Rennie. :( Definitely a fun little film i would pick up if i saw it for 5 bucks or less. Apparently i wasn't the only one, in the US it went from limited release to DVD.


I love that one shot when Caviezel tosses the torch and the creature is illuminated for a moment before snuffing the flame. Just an awesome flick.
As the ancient Tibetan philosophy states:"Don't start none... won't be none...".
User avatar
Steve T Power
Judge
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, CA

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby molly1216 » Wed Aug 11, 2010 1:34 pm

Steve T Power wrote:
molly1216 wrote:Outlander (2008) which try as it might...did not suck. An hyper-extension of Beowulf and The 13th Warrior..IMHO it was better than either of those. The production values were awesome...the CGI monster was awesome...the dialogue was NOT laughable, and the plot aside from a couple of wonky moments was simple and exciting. (the destruction of the beacon scene should have been shortened to just him smashing it.) But I am still shake my head wondering how James Caviezel manages to get lead roles, he just seems sooooo bland. This film seemed written for Dennis Quaid but Caviezel played it like he was Michael Rennie. :( Definitely a fun little film i would pick up if i saw it for 5 bucks or less. Apparently i wasn't the only one, in the US it went from limited release to DVD.


I love that one shot when Caviezel tosses the torch and the creature is illuminated for a moment before snuffing the flame. Just an awesome flick.

If the creature or the CGI had been unbelievable the rest of the film would not have carried it.
The creature was a character not just a Jaws wanna be.
the closest comparison i can think of is the Host.
"Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?" - Douglas Adams
User avatar
molly1216
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 3501
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2004 2:43 pm
Location: methuen, ma

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Gabriel Girard » Wed Aug 11, 2010 6:09 pm

The Beach (2000) - I enjoyed it despite its unevenness. It looks beautiful, DiCaprio is in great form and it has a nice allegorical feeling - I wished it would have had the guts to go to a darker place ending wise, also the script could have used more polish. Perhaps Danny Boyle's only failure - it still feels like more of a Boyle movie than Slumdog Millionaire did. A nice evasion for 2 hours but nothing really memorable, I didn't feel like I wasted my time watching it though.
User avatar
Gabriel Girard
County Attorney
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: Montréal, Québec

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Bryan Pope » Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:51 am

The Kids Are All Right -- Very, very good movie, but definitely not for all tastes. Sexually, it's quite frank, but it exposes many small truths about marriage, family dynamics and how we treat those we are closest to. One thing in particular I admired about it is that, while the story revolves around a lesbian couple, the movie is not about their lesbianism -- that's just another facet of who these women are. Julianne Moore and (especially) Annette Bening are *outstanding*. Mark Ruffalo plays a difficult role well, too. Good movie all around. Often funny, often uncomfortable and often at the same time.
Agnes, it's me...Billy.
User avatar
Bryan Pope
Judge
 
Posts: 833
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 10:44 am
Location: Texas

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby hoytereden » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:02 pm

No Regrets For Our Youth -I'm a sucker for Setsuko Hara and this was my first non-Ozu film with her. Powerful film. Next up: The Idiot.
"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead"-Stan Laurel
Moe-"Were you scared?" Larry-"No, just apprehensive." Moe-"Apprehensive, that's a pretty big word.What's it mean?" Larry-"That's scared with a college education!"
User avatar
hoytereden
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 5:24 pm
Location: The Big Island of Hawaii

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby mavrach » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:02 pm

Assault on Precinct 13 - An awesome entry from John Carpenter that never seems to get mentioned. The action and tension hold up today, which is all the more amazing considering the budget they had. And as urban as the setting is, the western feel is absolutely there.
+1. this is very interesting.
User avatar
mavrach
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2004 11:41 am
Location: North Jersey, at the end of a one-way dead-end road.

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Steve T Power » Fri Aug 13, 2010 5:18 am

mavrach wrote:Assault on Precinct 13 - An awesome entry from John Carpenter that never seems to get mentioned. The action and tension hold up today, which is all the more amazing considering the budget they had. And as urban as the setting is, the western feel is absolutely there.


The moment the ice cream hit the ground, I was totally sold. Nice early Carpenter score too!
As the ancient Tibetan philosophy states:"Don't start none... won't be none...".
User avatar
Steve T Power
Judge
 
Posts: 5351
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 3:08 pm
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland, CA

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby yellow ledbetter » Fri Aug 13, 2010 3:13 pm

watched Clash of the Titans last night, better then I thought it would be. Sure it wasn't great, but it had some good things going for it and was kinda entertaning. A friend showed me Kick-Ass recently, and I didn't really get into that one. I loved the scenes with Nicolas Cage interacting with his daughter, but most of the time the movie felt like it was trying too hard. I wasn't offended, it just wasn't for me.
yellow ledbetter
Paralegal
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:13 pm

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby ccb » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:57 pm

molly1216 wrote:
Steve T Power wrote:
molly1216 wrote:Outlander (2008) which try as it might...did not suck. An hyper-extension of Beowulf and The 13th Warrior..IMHO it was better than either of those. The production values were awesome...the CGI monster was awesome...the dialogue was NOT laughable, and the plot aside from a couple of wonky moments was simple and exciting. (the destruction of the beacon scene should have been shortened to just him smashing it.) But I am still shake my head wondering how James Caviezel manages to get lead roles, he just seems sooooo bland. This film seemed written for Dennis Quaid but Caviezel played it like he was Michael Rennie. :( Definitely a fun little film i would pick up if i saw it for 5 bucks or less. Apparently i wasn't the only one, in the US it went from limited release to DVD.
I love that one shot when Caviezel tosses the torch and the creature is illuminated for a moment before snuffing the flame. Just an awesome flick.
If the creature or the CGI had been unbelievable the rest of the film would not have carried it.
The creature was a character not just a Jaws wanna be.
the closest comparison i can think of is the Host.
Yes, I love it too. One of the few DVDs bought blind (well, after reading reviews.)
Steve T Power wrote:... the creature is illuminated for a moment before snuffing the flame.
Yep!
When I find myself in times of trouble, I say 'boy, you gotta carry that weight.' I am he, you are he, you are me, we are all together, speaking words of wisdom. Come together, right now. Amen.
User avatar
ccb
City Prosecutor
 
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:02 am
Location: sunny FL

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Mach6 » Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:32 pm

The Expendables: Does my ManCard get revoked if I say it was OK or give it 2.5 stars out of 4? I still had a good time & thought it was a better “dumb” mercenary action movie than the A-Team.

MINOR SPOILERS:

The Awesome: The opening rescue sequence on the Ocean Cruise/Liner, the napalm weapon on the Expendables’ plane, Terry Crew’s super gun that kills or destroys anything in its path, the Stone Cold Steve Austin vs. Stallone fight, the Stone Cold vs. Randy Couture (WWE vs. UFC?) fight, & Dolph Lundgren almost stealing the movie by reprising his dickhead character from Universal Soldier.

The Good: It only lasted two minutes, but The Arnold, Willis, & Stallone face-to-face-to-face was nostalgic fun & the “He wants to be the President” line got the biggest laugh out of the theater. Mickey Rourke gave a very soulful performance that would’ve been more powerful if Stallone didn't have the camera in extreme close up on Rourke’s face nearly 90% of the time.

The Bad: The Charisma Carpenter/Statham romance was a useless storyline & a thankless role for Carpenter, Eric Roberts' disappointing & generic rogue CIA agent role, way too many extreme close up camera angles, the Jet Li “short” jokes (ugh!), in the last 30 minutes after the 1,000th explosion & 10,000th henchman got killed I got numbed to it all & wanted to get to the final confrontation with Roberts & end it already. Stallone directed the ultra-violence & action way more coherently & efficiently in Rambo.

I maybe in the minority with this opinion cause the rowdy Saturday night crowd I was watching with dug every second of it. Heck, they were even screaming their lungs off when Statham was beating up Carpenter’s ex-boyfriend.
Mach6
City Attorney
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 5:12 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Future Man » Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:41 pm

Fitzcarraldo
So many sights to behold and quite an inspirational story.
Future Man
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1884
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 9:05 pm

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Gabriel Girard » Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:44 pm

Shutter Island - Easily mt favorite Scorsese DiCaprio flick so far. Marty really goes for broke with the atmosphere and Leo is deliciously unstable. All the supporting players are up to part and Robert Ricardson's photography is drop-dead stunning. Loved the use of Lygeti and of Mahler. As for the script - it stays really close to the book and I actually liked that they dropped more hints earlier than Lehane did - the ending really blindsided me in the book and I was pretty angry at it because it's so conventionnal, it fits more in the film's gothic, ''noir'' atmosphere.
User avatar
Gabriel Girard
County Attorney
 
Posts: 2267
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:42 pm
Location: Montréal, Québec

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby J.M. Vargas » Sun Aug 15, 2010 8:18 pm

Mach6 wrote:The Expendables: Does my ManCard get revoked if I say it was OK or give it 2.5 stars out of 4?


DDDDZZZZZZZZZZZZTTTTT!!! - REVOKED! ;-) :D
'You can't make chicken salad out of chicken s***'
User avatar
J.M. Vargas
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 3083
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 6:23 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby HGervais » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:32 pm

Having a bad case of writer's block over three or four paragraphs so I went and saw a movie. Scott Pilgrim vs. The World is a blast. Edgar Wright is three for three. There is so much going on with this movie both from an emotional level & a visual aspect that it begs to be viewed again. And soon. Other adaptations of comic books & anime have tried with limited success to bring the comic book page to life but Wright is the first one to to truly do it. Go see this movie because this is why you love movies.
"The most dementing of all modern sins: the inability to distinquish excellence from success."-David Hare
User avatar
HGervais
Judge
 
Posts: 4725
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:14 am
Location: Greater New Orleans

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby Boba Fett » Mon Aug 16, 2010 2:37 pm

HGervais wrote:Having a bad case of writer's block over three or four paragraphs so I went and saw a movie. Scott Pilgrim vs. The World is a blast. Edgar Wright is three for three. There is so much going on with this movie both from an emotional level & a visual aspect that it begs to be viewed again. And soon. Other adaptations of comic books & anime have tried with limited success to bring the comic book page to life but Wright is the first one to to truly do it. Go see this movie because this is why you love movies.

I despise Michael Cera and the comic series, but Wright is enough to get me to give this a shot.
"I assure you, whatever the others promise to do, when it comes to the showdown, they won't be there."
User avatar
Boba Fett
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1714
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 2:11 am
Location: Oregon

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby HGervais » Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:05 pm

Personally I don't get or understand the Cera hatred. He plays a certain type not unlike Woody Allen, John Wayne and a host of other actors through the decades have done. That said, his schtick is modified somewhat for Scott Pilgrim. I really like how both the leads kind of start out as jerks. Like I noted, the emotional content runs a lot deeper than a person would think and once you combine that with Wright's visual style & inventiveness, it adds up to a pretty amazing experience. And I'm walking into this both as a non-gamer and a person who has never seen a page of the comic it is based on.
"The most dementing of all modern sins: the inability to distinquish excellence from success."-David Hare
User avatar
HGervais
Judge
 
Posts: 4725
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 12:14 am
Location: Greater New Orleans

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby J.M. Vargas » Tue Aug 17, 2010 2:47 pm

hoytereden wrote:No Regrets For Our Youth -I'm a sucker for Setsuko Hara and this was my first non-Ozu film with her. Powerful film. Next up: The Idiot.


Got that one in my DVR as well. Can't wait to see how good (bad?) an actress Setsuko is when she's not being directed by Ozu.
'You can't make chicken salad out of chicken s***'
User avatar
J.M. Vargas
County Prosecutor
 
Posts: 3083
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 6:23 am
Location: New York, NY

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby hoytereden » Tue Aug 17, 2010 8:31 pm

J.M. Vargas wrote:
hoytereden wrote:No Regrets For Our Youth -I'm a sucker for Setsuko Hara and this was my first non-Ozu film with her. Powerful film. Next up: The Idiot.


Got that one in my DVR as well. Can't wait to see how good (bad?) an actress Setsuko is when she's not being directed by Ozu.

She's terrific in NRFOY and man how she suffers in this film. I think you'll come away impressed. :D
"You can lead a horse to water but a pencil must be lead"-Stan Laurel
Moe-"Were you scared?" Larry-"No, just apprehensive." Moe-"Apprehensive, that's a pretty big word.What's it mean?" Larry-"That's scared with a college education!"
User avatar
hoytereden
County Attorney
 
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 5:24 pm
Location: The Big Island of Hawaii

Re: AUG(ment your b)UST 2010 Watching Thread!

Postby yellow ledbetter » Wed Aug 18, 2010 1:45 am

finished The Losers, had a lot of fun watching it. Patric's performance is off the hook and the rest of the actors were very well cast. I think this one in a few years will definitely have it's cult
yellow ledbetter
Paralegal
 
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 8:13 pm

Next

Return to Movies

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest