DVD Verdict
Home About Deals Blu-ray DVD Reviews Upcoming DVD Releases Contest Podcasts Judges Jury Room Contact  

Case Number 27679: Small Claims Court

Buy Ironclad: Battle for Blood at Amazon

Ironclad: Battle for Blood

XLrator Media // 2013 // 108 Minutes // Not Rated
Reviewed by Judge David Johnson // August 27th, 2014

• View Judge Johnson's Dossier
• E-mail Judge Johnson
• Printer Friendly Review

Every purchase you make through these Amazon links supports DVD Verdict's reviewing efforts. Thank you!


All Rise...

Judge David Johnson is clad in irony.

The Charge

A new chapter in savage Medieval warfare.

The Case

Following the blood-soaked events of the siege of Rochester Castle depicted in the first Ironclad, new violence is set to unspool. Another castle is about to get razed to the ground. This time by a war-band of Celtic ravagers. Driven mad with vengeance over the death of his son, the Celtic chieftain mounts an unrelenting assault against the castle, threatening to kill ever man, woman and child within its walls.

Mortally wounded and desperate, the king sends his son out to get help. His target: the king's nephew, Guy (Thomas Austen), a noted bad-ass with a sketchy history but willingness to get his hands filthy with his opponents' blood. The prince makes a convincing case, so Guy and a few of his sword-for-hire pals make their way to the siege and get their violence on. But, this being an Ironclad movie, it's all going to end bloody and the survivors can be counted on one forcefully amputated hand.

As a fan of the original Ironclad, I had moderately high expectations for the follow-up. The original writer/director, Jonathan English, was back in the saddle for the sequel and more of the same relentless, siege-centered Medieval warfare was promised. On paper, Battle for Blood seemed to have the necessary ingredients for a killer outing.

But something is missing here. The first suspect has to be the cast. While Austen and Michelle Fairley are no stiffs, the cast doesn't measure up to the original's lineup, highlighted by a bad-ass James Purefoy, Brian Cox and a legendary scenery-chewing dickhead performance by Paul Giamatti. Add to that the historical significance of this excursion doesn't match up with the original's; the story this go-round is pretty much a family soap opera/revenge saga doused with sinew.

The biggest discrepancy between the two films is the action. And, really, even if we took away the first Ironclad as a baseline reference, the mayhem in Battle for Blood would still disappoint. Obviously dealing with a tighter budget this time around, English has been forced to deemphasize some of the bigger set-pieces, focusing more on intimate battle encounters—which would be fine, if these battles were a) creatively staged or b) shot with a modicum of stability. For some reason, English chooses to dial down his frame-rate for virtually every action moment and what could have been a nice touch to add some visceral smack to the bludgeoning melts down into a gimmicky eye-gouger. What are you doing man?

The DVD: 1.85:1 anamorphic widescreen, 5.1 Dolby Digital, and a making-of featurette.

The Verdict


Give us your feedback!

Did we give Ironclad: Battle for Blood a fair trial? yes / no

Share This Review

Follow DVD Verdict

Other Reviews You Might Enjoy

• Happy Times
• Swordfish (Blu-Ray)
• Spawn
• Excalibur (HD DVD)

DVD Reviews Quick Index

• DVD Releases
• Recent DVD Reviews
• Search for a DVD review...

Scales of Justice

Judgment: 65

Perp Profile

Studio: XLrator Media
Video Formats:
• 1.85:1 Anamorphic
Audio Formats:
• Dolby Digital 5.1 Surround (English)
• English
Running Time: 108 Minutes
Release Year: 2013
MPAA Rating: Not Rated
• Action
• Adventure
• Foreign

Distinguishing Marks

• Featurette
• Trailer


• IMDb

DVD | Blu-ray | Upcoming DVD Releases | About | Staff | Jobs | Contact | Subscribe | Find us on Google+ | Privacy Policy

Review content copyright © 2014 David Johnson; Site design and review layout copyright © 2016 Verdict Partners LLC. All rights reserved.