|
|
Case Number 12801: Small Claims CourtMasters Of Horror: The V Word
Starz Home Entertainment // 2006 // 58 Minutes // Not Rated Judge Dylan Charles only makes late-night excursions to the 7-Eleven.
The Charge"Hear that, huh? Hear the night calling you? Oh my little man, why don't you just accept what you're becoming?" The CaseTwo friends, Arjay Smith and Brandon Naword, who love to play video games decide they're going to go see a real dead body. Their late-night excursion to the funeral home unleashes Michael Ironside and people start to die. Soon, one friend must make the choice to either become an evil bloodsucking force for Satan or not in Masters of Horror: The V Word. For those who don't know what Masters of Horror is, here's the summary, quick and dirty. Experienced directors and writers in the genre, that is to say, masters of horror, take a low-budget whack at a horror flick. John Carpenter, Dario Argento, and John Landis have all contributed to the series among many others. Now it's Ernest Dickerson's (Demon Night) turn at bat. The V Word has a kind of newish take on vampires that would have been interesting to see in a better-made movie. Rather than the usual dapper vampire who neatly punctures his victims and takes a sip, we have Michael Ironside tearing out people's throats. This grotesquery of a vampire film is a nice change from Tom Cruise dressing like a 18th century dandy, but the only thing The V Word has going for it is a poorly dressed Michael Ironsides. Everything else is just a painful exercise in horror movie clichés. The whole "reluctant vampire" plotline has been done before and adding several hundred references to Doom doesn't make it new and hip. I'm not sure if Ernest Dickerson was attempting some sort of social commentary by mentioning Doom, but if he was, I'm not really getting his point. People who play video games are potentially more likely to get eaten by the undead? The whole video game thread is clumsily injected into the proceedings and feels tacked on. In any event, unoriginal stories and reused plot devices can be forgiven if a horror movie succeeds at its primary goal; to provoke horror in the audience member. That didn't happen so much here. The plot meanders, fizzles, and then fades. The friends wander into a funeral home and are scared by spooky organ music and blood smears until they're attacked by the villain, who then promptly disappears for a majority of the movie. Bizarre POV shots do little except show that vampires have pretty crappy vision. There are several features that are standard fare for most of the Masters of Horror discs. There are a few making-of documentaries that are informative about the effects used. There's a commentary by the director and the screenwriter, which fluctuates in how entertaining it is, but does add a fair amount of insight into what made The V Word what it is. Masters of Horror: The V Word tries to add some new flavor into the vampire genre, but fails to provide any real scares. Similar Decisions
• C.H.U.D. Give us your feedback!Did we give Masters Of Horror: The V Word a fair trial? yes / no Share your thoughts on this review in the Jury Room |
|
Support DVD Verdict | Promote your release | Privacy policy | Manifesto | Contact us
Review content copyright © 2008 Dylan Charles; Site design and review layout copyright © 2008 HipClick Designs LLC. All rights reserved.